PEER REVIEW OF SOLIDS HANDLING SYSTEM
A peer review is a process in which a design is reviewed and evaluated by a peer who is independent and an expert in the field. It is an invaluable tool a stakeholder uses to make decisions regarding the suitability of a process design. In a peer review, one examines soundness of presented ideas; it is not value engineering.
When designing a solids handling system or equipment that will play an important role in reliable and efficient plant operation, it is advisable to have the design reviewed by a peer. This ensures that there are no major engineering mistakes or issues overlooked and the appropriate effort has been made to develop both a safe and cost effective design.
A peer review is important when:
- Reliable performance is crucial
- Process design lacks redundancy
- Operation is related to public health and safety
- Using new technology or design methods
- Working with new or unique bulk solids
In a peer review, we evaluate the conceptual and technical soundness of equipment or process design for its likelihood of achieving the intended objectives. A peer review can be conducted on components such as a stockpile, silo, hopper, feeder, chute, blender, etc.
Our peer review involves verification of:
- Assumptions and governing laws
- Appropriate procedures and analyses
- Attainment of client’s needs and specifications
- Feasibility and practicality of the process design
- Solids handling effects on process or equipment
Often, companies use peer review as an integral part of project milestones; a peer review is commonly requested after design completion. Note that insurance carriers and major equity stakeholders are usually willing to pay for a substantial part of the peer review service.